GeomVerse: A Systematic Evaluation of Large Models for Geometric Reasoning

Mehran Kazemi, Hamidreza Alvari, Ankit Anand, Jialin Wu, Xi Chen, Radu Soricut

Keywords: Geometry, Multi-hop Reasoning, Systematic Evaluation, Vision Language Models

TL;DR: This paper presents a synthetic dataset of geometry questions with controllable difficulty levels along multiple axes, for a systematic evaluation of the reasoning abilities of VLMs.

Abstract: Large language models have shown impressive results for multi-hop mathematical reasoning when the input question is only textual. Many mathematical reasoning problems, however, contain both text and image. With the ever-increasing adoption of vision language models (VLMs), understanding their reasoning abilities for such problems is crucial. In this paper, we evaluate the reasoning capabilities of VLMs along various axes through the lens of geometry problems. We procedurally create a synthetic dataset of geometry questions with controllable difficulty levels along multiple axes, thus enabling a systematic evaluation. The empirical results obtained using our benchmark for state-of-the-art VLMs indicate that these models are not as capable in subjects like geometry (and, by generalization, other topics requiring similar reasoning) as suggested by previous benchmarks. This is made especially clear by the construction of our benchmark at various depth levels, since solving higher-depth problems requires long chains of reasoning rather than additional memorized knowledge.

Submission Number: 38