Towards Learning to Reason at Pre-Training Scale
Keywords: large language models, self-improvement, reasoning
TL;DR: We provide analysis and take initial steps towards learning to reason on pretraining-scale data
Abstract: Prompting a Large Language Model (LLM) to output Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning improves performance on complex problem-solving tasks. Moreover, several popular approaches exist to "self-improve" the CoT reasoning abilities of LLMs on tasks where supervised (question, answer) datasets are already available. An emerging line of work explores whether self-improvement is possible without these supervised datasets, instead utilizing the same large, unstructured text corpora as used during pre-training. This would overcome the data availability bottleneck present in current self-improvement methods, and open the door towards compute-only scaling of language model reasoning ability. We investigate a fundamental question in this line of work: What constitutes a suitable reward function for learning to reason during general language model pretraining? We outline the desirable qualities of such a reward function and empirically demonstrate how different functions affect what reasoning is learnt and where reasoning is rewarded. Using these insights, we introduce a novel reward function called Reasoning Advantage (RA) that facilitates self-improving CoT reasoning on free-form question-answering (QA) data, where answers are unstructured and difficult to verify. We also perform an exploratory experiment optimizing RA on general unstructured text using offline RL, and our analysis indicates that future work should investigate methods for generating a more diverse set of CoTs.
Primary Area: foundation or frontier models, including LLMs
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Reciprocal Reviewing: I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 11621
Loading