Keywords: Human Trajectory Prediction
TL;DR: For the first time, we study individual feedback, which is derived from early predictions on a target, to improve the accuracy of subsequent predictions on the same agent. We design an external module IAN to model it and prove its effectiveness.
Abstract: Human trajectory prediction is fundamental for autonomous driving and service robot. The research community has studied various important aspects of this task and made remarkable progress recently. However, there is an essential perspective which is not well exploited in previous research all along, namely individual feedback. Individual feedback exists in the sequential nature of trajectory prediction, where earlier predictions of a target can be verified over time by his ground-truth trajectories to obtain feedback which provides valuable experience for subsequent predictions on the same agent. In this paper, we show such feedback can reveal the strengths and weaknesses of the model's predictions on a specific target and heuristically guide to deliver better predictions on him. We present an interactive adjustment network to effectively model and leverage the feedback. This network first exploits the feedback from previous predictions to dynamically generate an adjuster which then interactively makes appropriate adjustments to current predictions for more accurate ones. We raise a novel displacement expectation loss to train this interactive architecture. Through experiments on representative prediction methods and widely-used benchmarks, we demonstrate the great value of individual feedback and the superior effectiveness of proposed interactive adjustment network. Our code will be made publicly available.
Supplementary Material: zip
Primary Area: applications to robotics, autonomy, planning
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Reciprocal Reviewing: I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 7210
Loading