Faster Algorithms for Structured Linear and Kernel Support Vector Machines
Keywords: interior point method, support vector machine, data structure
TL;DR: We design the first nearly-linear time, interior point algorithm for approximately solving support vector machine programs.
Abstract: Quadratic programming is a ubiquitous prototype in convex programming. Many machine learning problems can be formulated as quadratic programming, including the famous Support Vector Machines (SVMs). Linear and kernel SVMs have been among the most popular models in machine learning over the past three decades, prior to the deep learning era.
Generally, a quadratic program has an input size of $\Theta(n^2)$, where $n$ is the number of variables. Assuming the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis ($\textsf{SETH}$), it is known that no $O(n^{2-o(1)})$ time algorithm exists when the quadratic objective matrix is positive semidefinite (Backurs, Indyk, and Schmidt, NeurIPS'17). However, problems such as SVMs usually admit much smaller input sizes: one is given $n$ data points, each of dimension $d$, and $d$ is oftentimes much smaller than $n$. Furthermore, the SVM program has only $O(1)$ equality linear constraints. This suggests that faster algorithms are feasible, provided the program exhibits certain structures.
In this work, we design the first nearly-linear time algorithm for solving quadratic programs whenever the quadratic objective admits a low-rank factorization, and the number of linear constraints is small. Consequently, we obtain results for SVMs:
* For linear SVM when the input data is $d$-dimensional, our algorithm runs in time $\widetilde O(nd^{(\omega+1)/2}\log(1/\epsilon))$ where $\omega\approx 2.37$ is the fast matrix multiplication exponent;
* For Gaussian kernel SVM, when the data dimension $d = O(\log n)$ and the squared dataset radius is sub-logarithmic in $n$, our algorithm runs in time $O(n^{1+o(1)}\log(1/\epsilon))$. We also prove that when the squared dataset radius is at least $\Omega(\log^2 n)$, then $\Omega(n^{2-o(1)})$ time is required. This improves upon the prior best lower bound in both the dimension $d$ and the squared dataset radius.
Primary Area: optimization
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Reciprocal Reviewing: I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 5565
Loading