On Stochastic Contextual Bandits with Knapsacks in Small Budget Regime

ICLR 2025 Conference Submission13108 Authors

28 Sept 2024 (modified: 13 Oct 2024)ICLR 2025 Conference SubmissionEveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Keywords: Contextual bandits with knapsacks, small budget
Abstract: This paper studies stochastic contextual bandits with knapsack constraints (CBwK), where a learner observes a context, takes an action, receives a reward, and incurs a vector of costs at every round. The learner aims to maximize the cumulative rewards across $T$ rounds under the knapsack constraints with an initial budget of $B$. We study CBwK in the small budget regime where the budget $B = \Omega(\sqrt{T})$ and propose an Adaptive and Universal Primal--Dual algorithm (AUPD) that achieves strong regret performance: i) AUPD achieves $\tilde{O}((1 + \frac{\nu^*}{\delta b})\sqrt{T})$ regret under the strict feasibility assumption without any prior information, matching the best-known bounds; ii) AUPD achieves $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T}+ \frac{\nu^*}{\sqrt{b}}T^{\frac{3}{4}})$ regret without strict feasibility assumption, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first result in the literature. Here, the parameter $\nu^*$ represents the optimal average reward; $b=B/T$ is the average budget and $\delta b$ is the feasibility/safety margin. We establish these strong results through the adaptive budget-aware design, which effectively balances reward maximization and budget consumption. We provide a new perspective on analyzing budget consumption using the Lyapunov drift method, along with a refined analysis of its cumulative variance. Our theory is further supported by experiments conducted on a large-scale dataset.
Supplementary Material: zip
Primary Area: optimization
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Reciprocal Reviewing: I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 13108
Loading