REAL: Resilience and Adaptation using Large Language Models on Autonomous Aerial Robots

Andrea Tagliabue, Kota Kondo, Tong Zhao, Mason Peterson, Claudius T. Tewari, JONATHAN P HOW

Keywords: LLM, Adaptive Control, Decision Making, Aerial Robotics

TL;DR: We use LLMs' prior knowledge to trigger adaptive/resilient behaviors (e.g., tune controller, emergency-land) in an aerial robot in response to unplanned errors/issues (e.g., oscillations, drift), and with minimal user-provided prior knowledge

Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs) pre-trained on internet-scale datasets have shown impressive capabilities in code understanding, synthesis, and general purpose question-and-answering.
Key to their performance is the substantial prior knowledge acquired during training and their ability to reason over extended sequences of symbols, often presented in natural language.
In this work, we aim to harness the extensive long-term reasoning, natural language comprehension, and the available prior knowledge of LLMs for increased resilience and adaptation in autonomous mobile robots.
We introduce REAL, an approach for REsilience and Adaptation using LLMs. REAL provides a strategy to employ LLMs as a part of the mission planning and control framework of an autonomous robot.
The LLM employed by REAL provides (i) a source of prior knowledge to increase resilience for challenging scenarios that the system had not been explicitly designed for; (ii) a way to interpret natural-language and other log/diagnostic information available in the autonomy stack, for mission planning; (iii) a way to adapt the control inputs using minimal user-provided prior knowledge about the dynamics/kinematics of the robot.

We integrate REAL in the autonomy stack of a real multirotor, querying onboard an offboard LLM at $0.1$-$1.0$ Hz as part the robot's mission planning and control feedback loops. We demonstrate in real-world experiments the ability of the LLM to reduce the position tracking errors of a multirotor under the presence of (i) errors in the parameters of the controller and (ii) unmodeled dynamics. We also show (iii) decision making to avoid potentially dangerous scenarios (e.g., robot oscillates) that had not been explicitly accounted for in the initial prompt design.

Submission Number: 43