Mitigating Out-of-Distribution Data Density Overestimation in Energy-Based ModelsDownload PDF

22 Sept 2022 (modified: 13 Feb 2023)ICLR 2023 Conference Withdrawn SubmissionReaders: Everyone
Keywords: Energy-Based Model
TL;DR: We investigate why EBMs assign high density to OOD data and propose a method to mitigate this problem.
Abstract: Deep energy-based models (EBMs), which use deep neural networks (DNNs) as energy functions, are receiving increasing attention due to their ability to learn complex distributions. To train deep EBMs, the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) with short-run Langevin Monte Carlo (LMC) is often used. While the MLE with short-run LMC is computationally efficient compared to an MLE with full Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), it often assigns high density to out-of-distribution (OOD) data. To address this issue, here we systematically investigate why the MLE with short-run LMC can converge to EBMs with wrong density estimates, and reveal that the heuristic modifications to LMC introduced by previous works were the main problem. We then propose a Uniform Support Partitioning (USP) scheme that optimizes a set of points to evenly partition the support of the EBM and then uses the resulting points to approximate the EBM-MLE loss gradient. We empirically demonstrate that USP avoids the pitfalls of short-run LMC, leading to significantly improved OOD data detection performance on Fashion-MNIST.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics
Submission Guidelines: Yes
Please Choose The Closest Area That Your Submission Falls Into: Generative models
5 Replies

Loading

OpenReview is a long-term project to advance science through improved peer review with legal nonprofit status. We gratefully acknowledge the support of the OpenReview Sponsors. © 2025 OpenReview