Hilbert: Recursively Building Formal Proofs with Informal Reasoning

Published: 26 Jan 2026, Last Modified: 11 Feb 2026ICLR 2026 PosterEveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Keywords: Formal Mathematics, Automated Theorem Proving, Mathematical Reasoning, Lean 4, LLMs for Math, Agents
TL;DR: We built an AI system that combines informal math reasoning with formal proof verification, achieving state-of-the-art results on formal math benchmarks.
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive mathematical reasoning abilities, but their solutions frequently contain errors that cannot be automatically verified. Formal theorem proving systems such as Lean 4 offer automated verification with complete accuracy, motivating recent efforts to build specialized prover LLMs that generate verifiable proofs in formal languages. However, a significant gap remains: current prover LLMs solve substantially fewer problems than general-purpose LLMs operating in natural language. We introduce Hilbert, an agentic framework that bridges this gap by combining the complementary strengths of informal reasoning and formal verification. Our system orchestrates four components: an informal LLM that excels at mathematical reasoning, a specialized prover LLM optimized for Lean 4 tactics, a formal verifier, and a semantic theorem retriever. Given a problem that the prover is unable to solve, Hilbert employs recursive decomposition to split the problem into subgoals that it solves with the prover or reasoner LLM. It leverages verifier feedback to refine incorrect proofs as necessary. Experimental results demonstrate that Hilbert, substantially outperforms existing approaches on key benchmarks, achieving 99.2\% on miniF2F, 6.6\% points above the best publicly available method. Hilbert achieves the **best known result** on PutnamBench. It solves 462/660 problems (70.0\%), outperforming proprietary approaches like SeedProver (50.4\%) and achieving a 422\% improvement over the best publicly available baseline. Thus, Hilbert effectively narrows the gap between informal reasoning and formal proof generation.
Supplementary Material: zip
Primary Area: neurosymbolic & hybrid AI systems (physics-informed, logic & formal reasoning, etc.)
Submission Number: 10541
Loading