REVISITING LARS FOR LARGE BATCH TRAINING GENERALIZATION OF NEURAL NETWORKS

Khoi Hoang Do, Duong Minh Nguyen, Hoa Tien Nguyen, Long Tran-Thanh, Quoc Viet Pham

Primary Area: general machine learning (i.e., none of the above)

Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.

Keywords: Large Batch Training, Optimization, High Learning Rate, Redundant WarmUp

Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2024/AuthorGuide.

TL;DR: Analysis on LARS, LAMB and new optimizers for general applications and large-batch training

Abstract:

LARS and LAMB have emerged as prominent techniques in Large Batch Learn-
ing (LBL), ensuring the stability of AI training. One of the primary challenges
in LBL is convergence stability, where the AI agent usually gets trapped into the
sharp minimizer. Addressing this challenge, a relatively recent technique, known
as warm-up, has been employed. However, warm-up lacks a strong theoretical
foundation, leaving the door open for further exploration of more efficacious al-
gorithms. In light of this situation, we conduct empirical experiments to analyze
the behaviors of the two most popular optimizers in the LARS family: LARS
and LAMB, with and without a warm-up strategy. Our analyses give a compre-
hensive insight into the behavior of LARS, LAMB, and the necessity of a warm-
up technique in LBL, including an explanation of their failure in many cases.
Building upon these insights, we propose a novel algorithm called Time Varying
LARS (TVLARS), which facilitates robust training in the initial phase without the
need for warm-up. We run extensive experimental evaluations to demonstrate that
TVLARS achieves competitive results with LARS and LAMB when warm-up is
utilized while surpassing their performance without the warm-up technique.

Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors' identity.

No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.

Submission Number: 1309