Keywords: information design, stackelberg game, reinforcement learning, markov games, multi-agent system
Abstract: Multi-agent systems are prevalent across various domains, characterized by misaligned objectives and information asymmetry, which facilitate the study of incentive design and information design. Existing research often assumes known models and static environments. Motivated by this, we propose a Dynamic Incentive and Information Design (DIID) framework for finite-horizon Markov games, involving a principal and multiple agents.
Our focus is on how the principal learns their optimal policy based on data generated through interactions with agents.
The main challenge lies in balancing the principal's regret and violations of agents' incentive compatibility constraints during interactions. We establish a lower bound characterizing the trade-off between the two objectives and propose an algorithm attaining the optimal trade-off, i.e. $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{2/3})$ regret and constraint violation. Additionally, with access to additional unilateral deviation information of the agents, we propose an algorithm attaining improved guarantees that achieve $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{1/2})$ for both regret and constraint violation simultaneously.
Primary Area: reinforcement learning
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Reciprocal Reviewing: I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 5425
Loading