Navigating the Metrics Maze: Reconciling Score Magnitudes and Accuracies

Anonymous

Abstract: Ten years ago a single metric, BLEU, governed progress in machine translation research.For better or worse, there is no such consensus today, and consequently it is difficult for researchers to develop and retain the kinds of heuristic intuitions about metric deltas that drove earlier research and deployment decisions.This paper investigates the ``dynamic range'' of a number of modern metrics in an effort to provide a collective understanding of the meaning of differences in scores both within and among metrics; in other words, we ask `what point difference x in metric y is required between two systems for humans to notice?'We conduct our evaluation on a new large dataset, ToShip23, using it to discover deltas at which metrics achieve system-level differences that are meaningful to humans, which we measure by pairwise system accuracy.We additionally show that this method of establishing delta-accuracy is more stable than the standard use of statistical p-values in regards to testset size.Where data size permits, we also explore the effect of metric deltas and accuracy across finer-grained features such as translation direction, domain, and system closeness.

Paper Type: long

Research Area: Machine Translation

Contribution Types: Model analysis & interpretability, Data analysis

Languages Studied: The languages are not the main point, but we studied 97 languages.