Rethinking Kernel Program Repair: Benchmarking and Enhancing LLMs with RGym

Kareem Shehada, Yifan Wu, Wyatt D. Feng, Adithya Iyer, Gryphon Kumfert, Yangruibo Ding, Zhiyun Qian

Keywords: LLM, apr, kernel, linux, syzbot, gym, benchmark

TL;DR: We improve upon KGyms contributions by introducing RGym, a patch testing gym for kernel bugs that can run locally, a verified dataset of 143 bugs, and a simple APR to show a more realistic baseline.

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized automated program repair (APR) but current benchmarks like SWE-Bench predominantly focus on userspace applications and overlook the complexities of kernel-space debugging and repair. The Linux kernel poses unique challenges due to its monolithic structure, concurrency, and low-level hardware interactions. Prior efforts such as KGym and CrashFixer have highlighted the difficulty of APR in this domain, reporting low success rates or relying on costly and complex pipelines and pricey cloud infrastructure. In this work, we introduce RGym, a lightweight, platform-agnostic APR evaluation framework for the Linux kernel designed to operate on local commodity hardware. Built on RGym, we propose a simple yet effective APR pipeline leveraging specialized localization techniques (e.g., call stacks and blamed commits) to overcome the unrealistic usage of oracles in KGym. We test on a filtered and verified dataset of 143 bugs. Our method achieves up to a 43.36% pass rate with GPT-5 Thinking while maintaining a cost of under $0.20 per bug. We further conduct an ablation study to analyze contributions from our proposed localization strategy, prompt structure, and model choice, and demonstrate that feedback-based retries can significantly enhance success rates.

Submission Number: 92