MoA: Mixture of Aggregators Improves Slide-Level Diagnosis in Computational Pathology

Published: 14 Feb 2026, Last Modified: 15 Apr 2026MIDL 2026 PosterEveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Keywords: computational pathology, multiple instance learning, cytology
TL;DR: MoA: Mixture of Aggregators
Abstract: Multiple instance learning (MIL) is the standard for learning slide-level representations from whole slide images (WSIs), typically using a single attention-based aggregator to pool instance features. However, a single aggregator can struggle to capture morphological and compositional patterns of cells in pathology and cytology data, and different diseases may demand different pooling behaviours. We propose a mixture-of-aggregators framework that models complementary aspects of instance distributions in histology and hematologic cytology. A router with top-2 gating dynamically selects the most relevant aggregators per slide, and their outputs are fused into a patient-level representation. To avoid collapse to a single dominant expert aggregator, we add a load-balancing loss and Gumbel noise on the router logits. We evaluate our method on 19 different tasks from 16 datasets including histology and hematologic cytology. Compared to single-aggregator baselines, our approach improves diagnostic prediction accuracy by an average of 4.5\% over ABMIL and 12.6\% over TransMIL across all tasks. Beyond performance, our analysis shows that different aggregators attend to distinct, disease-specific instance distributions, providing interpretable insights into the diagnostic process.
Primary Subject Area: Application: Histopathology
Secondary Subject Area: Detection and Diagnosis
Registration Requirement: Yes
Reproducibility: https://github.com/fatihOzlugedik/MixtureOfAggregators
Visa & Travel: No
Read CFP & Author Instructions: Yes
Originality Policy: Yes
Single-blind & Not Under Review Elsewhere: Yes
LLM Policy: Yes
Midl Latex Submission Checklist: Ensure no LaTeX errors during compilation., Replace NNN with your OpenReview submission ID., Includes \documentclass{midl}, \jmlryear{2026}, \jmlrworkshop, \jmlrvolume, \editors, and correct \bibliography command., Did not override options of the hyperref package., Did not use the times package., Use the correct spelling and format, avoid Unicode characters, and use LaTeX equivalents instead., Any math in the title and abstract must be enclosed within $...$., Did not override the bibliography style defined in midl.cls and did not use \begin{thebibliography} directly to insert references., Avoid using \scalebox; use \resizebox when needed., Included all necessary figures and removed *unused* files in the zip archive., Removed special formatting, visual annotations, and highlights used during rebuttal., All special characters in the paper and .bib file use LaTeX commands (e.g., \'e for é)., No separate supplementary PDF uploads., Acknowledgements, references, and appendix must start after the main content.
Latex Code: zip
Copyright Form: pdf
Submission Number: 238
Loading