Visual Backdoor Attacks on MLLM Embodied Decision Making via Contrastive Trigger Learning

ICLR 2026 Conference Submission13690 Authors

Keywords: multimodal large language models, backdoor attack, embodied agent

TL;DR: We introduce the first systematic framework that injects visual backdoors into MLLM-based embodied agents.

Abstract:

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have advanced embodied agents by enabling direct perception, reasoning, and planning task-oriented actions from visual inputs.
However, such vision driven embodied agents open a new attack surface:
visual backdoor attacks, where the agent behaves normally until a visual trigger appears in the scene, then executes an attacker-specified policy.
We introduce BEAT, the first framework to inject such visual backdoors into MLLM-based embodied agents using objects in the environments as triggers. Unlike textual triggers, object triggers exhibit wide variation across viewpoints and lighting, making them difficult to implant reliably. BEAT addresses this challenge by (1) constructing a training set that spans diverse scenes, tasks, and trigger placements to expose agents to trigger variability, and (2) introducing a two-stage training scheme that first applies supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and then our novel Contrastive Trigger Learning (CTL). CTL formulates trigger discrimination as preference learning between trigger-present and trigger-free inputs, explicitly sharpening the decision boundaries to ensure precise backdoor activation.
Across various embodied agent benchmarks and MLLMs,
BEAT achieves attack success rates up to 80\%, while maintaining strong benign task performance, and generalizes reliably to out-of-distribution trigger placements. Notably, compared to naive SFT, CTL boosts backdoor activation accuracy up to 39\% under limited backdoor data. These findings expose a critical yet unexplored security risk in MLLM-based embodied agents, underscoring the need for robust defenses before real-world deployment.

Primary Area: alignment, fairness, safety, privacy, and societal considerations

Submission Number: 13690