Unravel Structured Heterogeneity of Tasks in Meta-Reinforcement Learning via Exploratory ClusteringDownload PDF

Published: 01 Feb 2023, Last Modified: 13 Feb 2023Submitted to ICLR 2023Readers: Everyone
Keywords: Meta Reinforcement Learning, Variational Inference
TL;DR: We propose a method to automatically discover and utilize the cluster structures of tasks for meta-reinforcement learning.
Abstract: Meta-reinforcement learning (meta-RL) is developed to quickly solve new tasks by leveraging knowledge from prior tasks. The assumption that tasks are drawn IID is typically made in previous studies, which ignore possible structured heterogeneity of tasks. The non-transferable knowledge caused by structured heterogeneity hinders fast adaptation in new tasks. In this paper, we formulate the structured heterogeneity of tasks via clustering such that transferable knowledge can be inferred within different clusters and non-transferable knowledge would be excluded across clusters thereby. To facilitate so, we develop a dedicated exploratory policy to discover task clusters by reducing uncertainty in posterior inference. Within the identified clusters, the exploitation policy is able to solve related tasks by utilizing knowledge shared within the clusters. Experiments on various MuJoCo tasks showed the proposed method can unravel cluster structures effectively in both rewards and state dynamics, proving strong advantages against a set of state-of-the-art baselines.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Supplementary Material: zip
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics
Submission Guidelines: Yes
Please Choose The Closest Area That Your Submission Falls Into: Reinforcement Learning (eg, decision and control, planning, hierarchical RL, robotics)
17 Replies