Redefining the task of Bioactivity Prediction

Yanwen Huang, Bowen Gao, Yinjun Jia, Hongbo Ma, Wei-Ying Ma, Ya-Qin Zhang, Yanyan Lan

Keywords: Bioactivity Prediction, New Dataset

Abstract: Small molecules are vital to modern medicine, and accurately predicting their bioactivity against protein targets is crucial for therapeutic discovery and development. However, current machine learning models often rely on spurious features, leading to biased outcomes. Notably, a simple pocket-only baseline can achieve results comparable to, and sometimes better than, more complex models that incorporate both the protein pockets and the small molecules. Our analysis reveals that this phenomenon arises from insufficient training data and an improper evaluation process, which is typically conducted at the pocket level rather than the small molecule level. To address these issues, we redefine the bioactivity prediction task by introducing the SIU dataset-a million-scale Structural small molecule-protein Interaction dataset for Unbiased bioactivity prediction task, which is 50 times larger than the widely used PDBbind. The bioactivity labels in SIU are derived from wet experiments and organized by label types, ensuring greater accuracy and comparability. The complexes in SIU are constructed using a majority vote from three commonly used docking software programs, enhancing their reliability. Additionally, the structure of SIU allows for multiple small molecules to be associated with each protein pocket, enabling the redefinition of evaluation metrics like Pearson and Spearman correlations across different small molecules targeting the same protein pocket. Experimental results demonstrate that this new task provides a more challenging and meaningful benchmark for training and evaluating bioactivity prediction models, ultimately offering a more robust assessment of model performance.

Primary Area: datasets and benchmarks

Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.

Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.

Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.

No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.

Submission Number: 9500