Personality Profiling: How informative are social media profiles in predicting personal information?

ACL ARR 2024 April Submission16 Authors

08 Apr 2024 (modified: 09 Jul 2024)ACL ARR 2024 April SubmissionEveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Abstract: Personality profiling has been utilised by companies for targeted advertising, political campaigns and public health campaigns. However, the accuracy and versatility of such models remains relatively unknown. Here we explore the extent to which peoples' online digital footprints can be used to profile their Myers-Briggs personality type. We analyse and compare four models: logistic regression, naive Bayes, support vector machines (SVMs) and random forests. We discover that a SVM model achieves the best accuracy of 20.95% for predicting a complete personality type. However, logistic regression models perform only marginally worse and are significantly faster to train and perform predictions. Moreover, we develop a statistical framework for assessing the importance of different sets of features in our models. We discover some features to be more informative than others in the Intuitive/Sensory (p = 0.032) and Thinking/Feeling (p = 0.019) models. Many labelled datasets present substantial class imbalances of personal characteristics on social media, including our own. We therefore highlight the need for attentive consideration when reporting model performance on such datasets and compare a number of methods to fix class-imbalance problems.
Paper Type: Long
Research Area: Computational Social Science and Cultural Analytics
Research Area Keywords: human behavior analysis; emotion detection and analysis; emoji prediction and analysis; NLP tools for social analysis; quantitative analyses of news and/or social media
Contribution Types: Model analysis & interpretability, Data analysis
Languages Studied: English
Section 2 Permission To Publish Peer Reviewers Content Agreement: Authors grant permission for ACL to publish peer reviewers' content
Submission Number: 16
Loading