Boosting LLM Translation Skills without General Ability Loss via Rationale Distillation

ICLR 2025 Conference Submission13856 Authors

28 Sept 2024 (modified: 27 Nov 2024)ICLR 2025 Conference SubmissionEveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Keywords: Large Language Model, Continual Instruction Tuning, Machine Translation
TL;DR: This paper propose to RaDis, which distilles self-generated rationales to improve LLMs' translation proficiency without inducing forgetting of general capabilities.
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved impressive results across numerous NLP tasks but still encounter difficulties in machine translation. Traditional methods to improve translation have typically involved fine-tuning LLMs using parallel corpora. However, vanilla fine-tuning often leads to catastrophic forgetting of the instruction-following capabilities and alignment with human preferences, compromising their broad general abilities and introducing potential security risks. These abilities, which are developed using proprietary and unavailable training data, make existing continual instruction tuning methods ineffective. To overcome this issue, we propose a novel approach called $\textbf{RaDis}$ ($\textbf{Ra}$tionale $\textbf{Dis}$tillation). RaDis harnesses the strong generative capabilities of LLMs to create rationales for training data, which are then “replayed” to prevent forgetting. These rationales $\textit{connect prior knowledge with new tasks}$, acting as $\textit{self-distillation targets}$ to regulate the training process. By jointly training on reference translations and self-generated rationales, the model can learn new translation skills while preserving its general abilities. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method enhances machine translation performance while maintaining the broader capabilities of LLMs across other tasks. This work presents a pathway for creating more versatile LLMs that excel in specialized tasks without compromising generality or safety and provides a fresh angle for utilizing rationales in the CL field.
Supplementary Material: zip
Primary Area: foundation or frontier models, including LLMs
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Reciprocal Reviewing: I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 13856
Loading