Keywords: Grid cells, Path Integration, AI, NeuroAI
TL;DR: We train feedforward and recurrent networks to preserve distances locally under a capacity constraint, and find that both networks learn grid-cell like representations, and that grid-like units are not strongly associated with path integration.
Abstract: Grid cells, found in the medial Entorhinal Cortex, are known for their regular spatial firing patterns. These cells have been proposed as the neural solution to a range of computational tasks, from performing path integration to serving as a metric for space. Their exact function, however, remains fiercely debated. In this work, we explore the consequences of demanding local distance preservation in networks subject to a capacity constraint. We consider two distinct self-supervised models, a feedforward network that learns to solve a purely spatial, local distance-based encoding task, and a recurrent network that solves the same problem during path integration. We find that this task leads to the emergence of highly grid cell-like representations in both networks. However, the recurrent network also features units with band-like representations. We subsequently prune velocity inputs to subsets of recurrent units, and find that their grid score is negatively correlated with path integration contribution. Thus, grid cells emerge without path integration in the feedforward network, and they appear significantly less important than band cells for path integration in the recurrent network. Our work provides a minimal model for learning grid-like spatial representations, and questions the role of grid cells as neural path integrators. Instead, it seems that local distance preservation and high population capacity is a more likely candidate task for learning grid cells in artificial neural networks.
Primary Area: unsupervised, self-supervised, semi-supervised, and supervised representation learning
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 6596
Loading