K-HALU: Multiple Answer Korean Hallucination Benchmark for Large Language Models

ICLR 2025 Conference Submission13748 Authors

Keywords: Hallucination, Benchmark dataset, Multiple answer, Korean, Large language model

TL;DR: Multiple-answer Korean hallucination benchmark for large language models

Abstract: Recent researchers and companies have been developing large language models (LLMs) specifically designed for particular purposes and have achieved significant advancements in various natural language processing tasks. However, LLMs are still prone to generating hallucinations—results that are unfaithful or inconsistent with the given input. As a result, the need for datasets to evaluate and demonstrate the hallucination detection capabilities of LLMs is increasingly recognized. Nonetheless, the Korean NLP community lacks publicly available benchmark datasets demonstrating the faithfulness of knowledge-based information. Furthermore, the few existing datasets that evaluate hallucination are limited in their access to the entire dataset, restricting detailed analysis beyond simple scoring, and are based on translated English knowledge. To address these challenges, we introduce K-HALU, a Korean benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' hallucination detection in Korean. This benchmark contains seven domains, considering the faithfulness of statements based on knowledge documents compiled from Korean news, magazines, and books. For more strict evaluation, 40% of the dataset is structured as multiple-answer questions, requiring models to select all possible correct answers from the given options. Our empirical results show that open-source LLMs still struggle with hallucination detection in Korean knowledge, emphasizing the need for a more detailed analysis of their limitations. The K-HALU benchmark will be made publicly available after the anonymous review period.

Primary Area: datasets and benchmarks

Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.

Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.

Reciprocal Reviewing: I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.

Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.

No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.

Submission Number: 13748