Select-Then-Decompose: From Empirical Analysis to Adaptive Selection Strategy for Task Decomposition in Large Language Models

ACL ARR 2025 May Submission5981 Authors

20 May 2025 (modified: 03 Jul 2025)ACL ARR 2025 May SubmissionEveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning and planning capabilities, driving extensive research into task decomposition. Existing task decomposition methods focus primarily on memory, tool usage, and feedback mechanisms, achieving notable success in specific domains, but they often overlook the trade-off between performance and cost. In this study, we first conduct a comprehensive investigation on task decomposition, identifying six categorization schemes. Then, we perform an empirical analysis of three factors that influence the performance and cost of task decomposition: categories of approaches, characteristics of tasks, and configuration of decomposition and execution models, uncovering three critical insights and summarizing a set of practical principles. Building on this analysis, we propose the Select-Then-Decompose strategy, which establishes a closed-loop problem-solving process composed of three stages: selection, execution, and verification. This strategy dynamically selects the most suitable decomposition approach based on task characteristics and enhances the reliability of the results through a verification module. Comprehensive evaluations across multiple benchmarks show that the Select-Then-Decompose consistently lies on the Pareto frontier, demonstrating an optimal balance between performance and cost. We will release our code upon acceptance.
Paper Type: Long
Research Area: Interpretability and Analysis of Models for NLP
Research Area Keywords: contrastive explanations; hierarchical & concept explanations; knowledge discovering
Contribution Types: Model analysis & interpretability, NLP engineering experiment, Data analysis
Languages Studied: English
Keywords: Task Decomposition in LLMs; Empirical Analysis; Performance–Cost Trade-off;
Submission Number: 5981
Loading