Keywords: Quantum Information Processing, LSTM
TL;DR: Using time-series readout with preprocessing, we improve superconducting qubit state fidelity by ~1% over Gaussian Mixture Models across quantum qubits, offering a lightweight solution.
Abstract: Measurement errors in quantum computers are very detrimental to quantum computations. The ability to efficiently and accurately readout quantum states is crucial for quantum error correction schemes and quantum algorithms. Readout fidelity is typically limited by a poor signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio between the quantum states we intend to classify, as well as energy relaxation (e.g., T1 decay) from an excited state to a lower state during readout. Superconducting quantum bits (qubits), one of the leading candidates for scalable quantum computing hardware, are particularly limited by energy relaxation due to their relatively short coherence times. While most approaches for classifying the results of readout on superconducting qubits typically utilize clustering algorithms (e.g., a Gaussian mixture model) on integrated readout signals, these cannot distinguish between a quantum bit that was in the ground state prior to measurement from a qubit that decays to the ground state during measurement. For this reason, we instead propose using machine learning (ML) on the raw (non-integrated) analog signal and classification models on the full time series data (i.e., the trajectory). We observe that time series classification methods, such as our chosen long short-term memory (LSTM) model, in combination with filtering and feature engineering techniques, consistently outperform clustering models. In particular, we find that the largest improvements come from reclassifying points in the boundary regions between neighboring clusters. These boundary points correspond to measurement records that deviate from the typical cluster, likely due to transient or noisy features in the signal that are not captured when the data is integrated. By retaining temporal information, sequence-aware models such as LSTMs can better discriminate these trajectories, whereas clustering methods based on integrated values are more prone to misclassifications.
Primary Area: other topics in machine learning (i.e., none of the above)
Submission Number: 21474
Loading