Finding Semantically Guided Repairs in PDDL Domains Using LLMs

Published: 02 Sept 2025, Last Modified: 16 Sept 2025HAXP 2025 OralEveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Keywords: ai planning, domain repair, modelling support, counterfactual explanation, explainablity
TL;DR: Leveraging LLMs to improve bling search techniques by incorporating semantic knowledge in PDDL files to find repairs that are more interesting for humans.
Abstract: Repairing Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) models is difficult because solutions must ensure correctness while remaining interpretable to human modellers. Existing hitting set methods identify minimal repair sets from whitelist and blacklist traces, but they cannot prefer semantically meaningful fixes and the true repair may not be minimal. We propose combining large language models (LLMs) with the hitting set framework, using semantic cues in PDDL action and predicate names to guide repairs. This hybrid approach provides contrastive, counterfactual explanations of why traces fail and how domains could behave differently.
Paper Type: New Short Paper
Submission Number: 7
Loading