Trustworthy Dataset Proof: Certifying the Authentic Use of Dataset in Training Models for Enhanced Trust

24 Sept 2024 (modified: 27 Nov 2024)ICLR 2025 Conference Withdrawn SubmissionEveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Keywords: dataset integrity; trustworthy dataset proof; data probe; watermark
Abstract: In the realm of deep learning, the veracity and integrity of the training data are pivotal for constructing reliable and transparent models. This study introduces the concept of Trustworthy Dataset Proof (TDP), which tackles the significant challenge of verifying the authenticity of training data as declared by trainers. Existing dataset provenance methods, which primarily aim at ownership verification rather than trust enhancement, often face challenges with usability and integrity. For instance, excessive operational demands and the inability to effectively verify dataset authenticity hinder their practical application. To address these shortcomings, we propose a novel technique termed Data Probe, which diverges from traditional watermarking by utilizing subtle variations in model output distributions to confirm the presence of a specific and small subset of training data. This model-agnostic approach improves usability by minimizing the intervention during the training process and ensures dataset integrity via a mechanism that only permits probe detection when the entire claimed dataset is utilized in training. Our study conducts extensive evaluations to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed data-drobe-based TDP framework, marking a significant step toward achieving transparency and trustworthiness in the use of training data in deep learning.
Primary Area: alignment, fairness, safety, privacy, and societal considerations
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Reciprocal Reviewing: I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 3743
Loading

OpenReview is a long-term project to advance science through improved peer review with legal nonprofit status. We gratefully acknowledge the support of the OpenReview Sponsors. © 2025 OpenReview