Disentangling misreporting from genuine adaptation in strategic settings: a causal approach

Dylan Zapzalka, Trenton Chang, Lindsay Warrenburg, Sae-Hwan Park, Daniel K Shenfeld, Ravi B Parikh, Jenna Wiens, Maggie Makar

Keywords: Causal Inference, Machine Learning, Strategic Adaptation, Misreporting

TL;DR: We propose a causally motivated estimator to quantify the extent to which strategic agents misreport their features.

Abstract: In settings where ML models are used to inform the allocation of resources, agents affected by the allocation decisions might have an incentive to strategically change their features to secure better outcomes. While prior work has studied strategic responses broadly, disentangling misreporting from genuine adaptation remains a fundamental challenge. In this paper, we propose a causally-motivated approach to identify and quantify how much an agent misreports on average by distinguishing deceptive changes in their features from genuine adaptation. Our key insight is that, unlike genuine adaptation, misreported features do not causally affect downstream variables (i.e., causal descendants). We exploit this asymmetry by comparing the causal effect of misreported features on their causal descendants as derived from manipulated datasets against those from unmanipulated datasets. We formally prove identifiability of the misreporting rate and characterize the variance of our estimator. We empirically validate our theoretical results using a semi-synthetic and real Medicare dataset with misreported data, demonstrating that our approach can be employed to identify misreporting in real-world scenarios.

Primary Area: Probabilistic methods (e.g., variational inference, causal inference, Gaussian processes)

Submission Number: 9518