Clip Body and Tail Separately: High Probability Guarantees for DP-SGD with Heavy Tails

ICLR 2025 Conference Submission49 Authors

13 Sept 2024 (modified: 13 Oct 2024)ICLR 2025 Conference SubmissionEveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Keywords: Privacy, DPSGD, Gradient Clipping, High Probability Bounds
Abstract: Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DPSGD) is widely utilized to preserve training data privacy in deep learning, which first clips the gradients to a predefined norm and then injects calibrated noise into the training procedure. Existing DPSGD works typically assume the gradients follow sub-Gaussian distributions and design various gradient clipping mechanisms to optimize training performance. However, recent studies have shown that the gradients in deep learning exhibit a heavy-tail phenomenon, that is, the tails of the gradient may have infinite variance, which leads to excessive clipping loss with existing mechanisms. To address this problem, we propose a novel approach, Discriminative Clipping~(DC)-DPSGD, with two key designs. First, we introduce a subspace identification technique to distinguish between body and tail gradients. Second, we present a discriminative clipping mechanism that applies different clipping thresholds separately for body and tail gradients to reduce the clipping loss. Under the non-convex condition and heavy-tailed sub-Weibull gradient noise assumption, DC-DPSGD reduces the empirical risk from ${\mathbb{O}\left(\log^{\max(0,\theta-1)}(T/\delta)\log^{2\theta}(\sqrt{T})\right)}$ to ${\mathbb{O}\left(\log(\sqrt{T})\right)}$ with heavy-tailed index $\theta> 1/2$, iterations $T$, and high probability $1-\delta$. Extensive experiments on five real-world datasets demonstrate that our approach outperforms three baselines by up to 9.72\% in terms of accuracy.
Supplementary Material: pdf
Primary Area: alignment, fairness, safety, privacy, and societal considerations
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Reciprocal Reviewing: I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 49
Loading