Synthesize Privacy-Preserving High-Resolution Images via Private Textual Intermediaries

Haoxiang Wang, Zinan Lin, Da Yu, Huishuai Zhang

Keywords: differential privacy, private evolution, private text bridges

Abstract: Generating high-fidelity, differentially private (DP) synthetic images offers a promising route to share and analyze sensitive visual data without compromising individual privacy. However, existing DP image synthesis methods struggle to produce high-resolution outputs that faithfully capture the structure of the original data. In this paper, we introduce a novel method, referred to as Synthesis via Private Textual Intermediaries (SPTI), that can generate high-resolution DP images with easy adoptions. The key idea is to shift the challenge of DP image synthesis from the image domain to the text domain by leveraging state-of-the-art DP text generation methods. SPTI first summarizes each private image into a concise textual description using image-to-text models, then applies a modified Private Evolution algorithm to generate DP text, and finally reconstructs images using text-to-image models. Notably, SPTI requires no model training, only inferences with off-the-shelf models. Given a private dataset, SPTI produces synthetic images of substantially higher quality than prior DP approaches. On the LSUN Bedroom dataset, SPTI attains an FID $=$ 26.71 under $\epsilon=1.0$, improving over Private Evolution’s FID of 40.36. Similarly, on MM-CelebA-HQ, SPTI achieves an FID $=$ 33.27 at $\epsilon=1.0$, compared to 57.01 from DP fine-tuning baselines. Overall, our results demonstrate that Synthesis via Private Textual Intermediaries provides a resource-efficient and proprietary-model-compatible framework for generating high-resolution DP synthetic images, greatly expanding access to private visual datasets. Our code release: https://github.com/MarkGodrick/SPTI

Primary Area: Social and economic aspects of machine learning (e.g., fairness, interpretability, human-AI interaction, privacy, safety, strategic behavior)

Flagged For Ethics Review: true

Submission Number: 15426