Adaptive Testing for LLM Evaluation: A Psychometric Alternative to Static Benchmarks

Peiyu Li, Xiuxiu Tang, Si Chen, Ying Cheng, Ronald Metoyer, Ting Hua, Nitesh V Chawla

Keywords: Adaptive testing, LLM evaluation

Abstract: Evaluating large language models (LLMs) typically requires thousands of benchmark items, making the process expensive, slow, and increasingly impractical at scale. Existing evaluation protocols rely on average accuracy over fixed item sets, treating all items as equally informative despite substantial variation in difficulty and discrimination. We introduce ATLAS, an adaptive testing framework based on Item Response Theory (IRT) that estimates model ability using Fisher information–guided item selection. ATLAS reduces the number of required items by up to 90\% while maintaining measurement precision. For instance, it matches whole-bank ability estimates using only 41 items (0.157 MAE) on HellaSwag (5,600 items). We further reconstruct accuracy from ATLAS's ability estimates and find that reconstructed accuracies closely match raw accuracies across all five benchmarks, indicating that ability $\theta$ preserves the global performance structure. At the same time, $\theta$ provides finer discrimination within accuracy-equivalent models: among more than 3000 evaluated models, 23--31\% shift by more than 10 rank positions, and models with identical accuracies receive meaningfully different ability estimates. Code and calibrated item banks available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/ATLAS-3210/README.md.

Primary Area: datasets and benchmarks

Submission Number: 20143