Tight Bounds for Maximum Weight Matroid Independent Set and Matching in the Zero Communication Model

Published: 18 Sept 2025, Last Modified: 29 Oct 2025NeurIPS 2025 posterEveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Keywords: matroids; matching; distributed algorithms; parallel algorithms; lower bounds
TL;DR: The paper introduce the zero communication model of computation, describes tight bounds for matroids and matchings in this model, and shows how they yield faster parameterized deterministic parallel algorithms to these problems.
Abstract: Recent years have revealed an unprecedented demand for AI-based technology, leading to a common setting where immense data is distributed across multiple locations. This creates a communication bottleneck among the storage facilities, often aiming to jointly solve tasks of small solution size $k$ from input of astronomically large size $n$. Motivated by federated and distributed machine learning applications, we study two fundamental optimization problems, maximum weight matroid independent set (MW-IS) and maximum weight matching (MWM), in a zero communication computational model. In this model, the data is dispersed between $m$ servers. Without any communication, each server has to send a message to a central server, which is required to compute an optimal solution for the original (large) instance. The goal is to minimize the size of the maximum message sent. For this natural restrictive model, we obtain deterministic algorithms that use $k$-data per server for MW-IS and $O(k^2)$-data per server for MWM, where $k$ is the solution size. We complement these results with tight lower bounds -- ruling out any asymptotic improvement even if randomization is allowed. Our algorithms are simple and run in nearly linear time. Interestingly, we show how our zero communication algorithms yield deterministic parallel algorithms with running times $O\left(\sqrt{k} \cdot \log n\right)$ and $O\left(k^4 \cdot \log n\right)$ for MW-IS and MWM, respectively.
Primary Area: Theory (e.g., control theory, learning theory, algorithmic game theory)
Submission Number: 11927
Loading