everyone
since 11 Feb 2023">EveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
We believe that we have made all the requested changes. Notable highlights:
The introduction now reads much more cleanly and the intro figure has been adjusted.
We investigated GCN's source-code, and we ran an actual experiment on GCN to verify that its AP scores were due to under-sampling negative edges. The experiment we ran was different from the one we suggested in our rebuttal, but regardless, it was quite conclusive.
Section 3.1 (now Sections 4.1, 4.1.1 and 4.1.2) has been expanded and clarified to better discuss our assumptions and how link prediction limits arise from edges appearing equivalent to a classifier.
The formulae in what used to be Section 4 (now Section 5) are better-explained and simpler to read.
In the latest revision (September 8, 2023), minor clarification was made to the proof in Appendix A.1.