STEM-PoM: Evaluating Language Models Math-Symbol Reasoning in Document Parsing

Jiaru Zou, Qing Wang, Pratyush Thakur, Nickvash Kani

Keywords: Mathematical Reasoning, Large Language Models, Mathematical Token Classification

TL;DR: STEM-PoM, a benchmark to evaluate language models math-symbol reasoning in document parsing.

Abstract: Advances in large language models (LLMs) have spurred research into enhancing their reasoning capabilities, particularly in math-rich STEM documents. While LLMs can generate equations or solve math-related queries, their ability to fully understand and interpret abstract mathematical symbols in long, math-rich documents remains limited. In this paper, we introduce STEM-PoM, a comprehensive benchmark dataset designed to evaluate LLMs' reasoning abilities on math symbols within contextual scientific text. The dataset, sourced from real-world ArXiv documents, contains over 2K math symbols classified as main attributes of variables, constants, operators, and unit descriptors, with additional sub-attributes including scalar/vector/matrix for variables and local/global/discipline-specific labels for both constants and operators. Our extensive experiments show that state-of-the-art LLMs achieve an average of 20-60\% accuracy under in-context learning and 50-60\% accuracy with fine-tuning, revealing a significant gap in their mathematical reasoning capabilities. STEM-PoM fuels future research of developing advanced Math-AI models that can robustly handle math symbols.

Concurrent Submissions: NAACL2025

Submission Number: 20