Benchmarking Ethics in Text-to-Image Models: A Holistic Dataset and Evaluator for Fairness, Toxicity, and Privacy

18 Sept 2024 (modified: 15 Nov 2024)ICLR 2025 Conference Withdrawn SubmissionEveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Keywords: Ethics, Benchmark, Text to image, Evaluation
Abstract: Text-to-image (T2I) models have rapidly advanced, enabling the generation of high-quality images from text prompts across various domains. However, these models raise significant ethical concerns, including the risk of generating harmful, biased, or private content. Existing safety benchmarks are limited in scope, lacking comprehensive coverage of critical ethical aspects such as detailed categories of toxicity, privacy, and fairness, and often rely on inadequate evaluation techniques. To address these gaps, we introduce T2IEthics, a comprehensive benchmark that rigorously evaluates T2I models across three key ethical dimensions: fairness, toxicity, and privacy. Additionally, we propose ImageGuard, a multimodal large language model-based evaluator designed for more accurate and nuanced ethical assessments. It significantly outperforms existing models including GPT-4o across all ethical dimensions. Using this benchmark, we evaluate 12 diffusion models, including popular models from the Stable Diffusion series. Our results indicate persistent issues with racial fairness, a tendency to generate toxic content, and significant variation in privacy protection among the models even when defense methods like concept erasing are employed.
Primary Area: alignment, fairness, safety, privacy, and societal considerations
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Reciprocal Reviewing: I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 1558
Loading