Evaluating Universal Interatomic Potentials for Molecular Dynamics of Real-World Minerals

Published: 03 Mar 2025, Last Modified: 09 Apr 2025AI4MAT-ICLR-2025 SpotlightEveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Submission Track: Findings & Open Challenges (Tiny Paper)
Submission Category: AI-Guided Design + Automated Material Characterization
Keywords: universal interatomic potentials, molecular dynamics, minerals, benchmarking
TL;DR: Benchmarking universal interatomic potentials on the dynamics simulation of real-world minerals
Abstract:

Universal interatomic potentials (UIPs) have emerged as promising models for capturing complex atomic interactions across diverse material families through graph-based representations. Recent UIP architectures, trained on density functional theory (DFT) trajectories spanning the periodic table, have demonstrated accuracy in energy and force predictions for 0 K structures. However, their efficacy for finite temperature molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of experimentally verified materials under physical conditions remains unexplored. We present a comprehensive evaluation of six state-of-the-art UIPs (CHGNET, M3GNET, MACE, MATTERSIM, SEVENNET, ORB) on a curated dataset, namely AMCSD-MD-2.4K, comprising ~2,400 minerals with experimentally validated crystal structures and densities from the American Mineralogist Crystal Structure Database. Our analysis comprises two components: (1) a systematic comparison of model performance across the mineral dataset, and (2) a quantitative assessment of temporal evolution during MD simulations, analyzing structural properties including density and lattice parameters. Our evaluation reveals significant performance variations among UIPs, with ORB and SEVENNET achieving completion rates of 99.96% and 98.75% respectively, while CHGNET completed only 7% of simulations. Furthermore, none of the models achieved the empirically accepted structural variation threshold of ±2.5%, with MACE, MATTERSIM, SEVENNET, and ORB showing comparatively better accuracy (R$^2$ > 0.8) in density predictions. This evaluation framework establishes rigorous benchmarks for assessing UIP performance in realistic atomistic simulations of mineral systems.

AI4Mat Journal Track: Yes
Submission Number: 67
Loading

OpenReview is a long-term project to advance science through improved peer review with legal nonprofit status. We gratefully acknowledge the support of the OpenReview Sponsors. © 2025 OpenReview