Stochastic Extragradient with Flip-Flop Shuffling & Anchoring: Provable Improvements

22 Sept 2023 (modified: 11 Feb 2024)Submitted to ICLR 2024EveryoneRevisionsBibTeX
Primary Area: optimization
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Keywords: minimax optimization, stochastic optimization, extragradient method, without-replacement sampling
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2024/AuthorGuide.
TL;DR: We study the convergence of the stochastic extragradient method with flip-flop shuffling sampling scheme and anchoring, and show provable improvements over other SGDA/SEG variants.
Abstract: In minimax optimization, the extragradient (EG) method has been extensively studied because it outperforms the gradient descent-ascent (GDA) method in both strongly-convex-strongly-concave (SC-SC) and convex-concave (C-C) problems. However, stochastic EG (SEG) has seen limited success, as it is known to converge only up to neighborhoods of equilibria for C-C problems. Motivated by the recent progress in analysis of shuffling-based stochastic optimization methods, we investigate the convergence of shuffling-based SEG in finite-sum minimax problems, in search of improved convergence guarantees for SEG under minimal algorithm modifications. Our analysis reveals that both random reshuffling and the recently proposed flip-flop shuffling (Rajput et al., 2022) alone cannot fix the nonconvergence issue in C-C problems. However, with an additional simple trick called anchoring, we develop the SEG with flip-flop anchoring (SEG-FFA) method which successfully converges in C-C problems. We also show upper and lower bounds in the SC-SC setting, demonstrating that SEG-FFA has a provably faster convergence rate compared to other shuffling-based methods as well.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors' identity.
Supplementary Material: pdf
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 5049
Loading