A Guided Design Framework for the Optimization of Therapeutic-like Antibodies

Published: 06 Mar 2025, Last Modified: 26 Apr 2025GEMEveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Track: Machine learning: computational method and/or computational results
Nature Biotechnology: Yes
Keywords: clinical, antibodies, antibody, drug, lipinski, biophysics, guided design, optimization, molecular descriptors, developability, proxy assays, benchmark, electrostatics, hydrophobicity
TL;DR: A general sequence-based framework that evaluates and optimizes antibodies for biophysical properties characteristic of clinical-stage antibodies
Abstract: Antibodies must meet stringent developability criteria for successful commercialization—a challenge for machine learning approaches given the limited available data. Selecting candidates with biophysical properties similar to clinical-stage antibodies offers an alternative to data-intensive approaches. However, such methods typically suffer from limited throughput due to structure-based calculations and can eliminate promising candidates through overly strict filtering. By benchmarking classical filtering methods against experimental datasets, with viscosity as a proof-of-concept, we identify an informative set of biophysical definitions (relevant to charge and hydrophobicity). Using these as optimization objectives for guided design, we introduce TherAbDesign, a sequence-based framework that evaluates and optimizes antibodies for developability without requiring structure prediction or physics-based computation. TherAbDesign proposes rational modifications to mimic the properties of successful therapeutic antibodies, which we demonstrate can improve known developability liabilities like high viscosity without explicitly modeling their mechanism of action.
Anonymization: This submission has been anonymized for double-blind review via the removal of identifying information such as names, affiliations, and identifying URLs.
Presenter: ~Amy_Wang2
Format: Yes, the presenting author will definitely attend in person because they attending ICLR for other complementary reasons.
Funding: No, the presenting author of this submission does *not* fall under ICLR’s funding aims, or has sufficient alternate funding.
Submission Number: 106
Loading

OpenReview is a long-term project to advance science through improved peer review with legal nonprofit status. We gratefully acknowledge the support of the OpenReview Sponsors. © 2025 OpenReview