Unsupervised Dynamic Graph Multi-Model Representation Learning for Temporal Patterns Discovery: Uncovering Parkinson’s Disease Stages Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Longitudinal Profiles

20 Sept 2025 (modified: 11 Feb 2026)Submitted to ICLR 2026EveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Keywords: Learning Representation, Dynamic Graphs, Parkinson’s Disease, deep learning, unsupervised learning
TL;DR: We created a multi-model graph learning method that integrates node representations across graph snapshots, capturing temporal trajectories and spatial context.
Abstract: Dynamic graph learning methods typically capture local structural information and short-range temporal dependencies at each time step. In this work, we introduce a dynamic graph learning architecture that generates time-step embeddings capturing both local structural context and progression-trajectory patterns for each node across an entire longitudinal sequence. Unlike existing approaches, our framework clusters fused embeddings that integrate (i) the global temporal trajectory of each node and (ii) its local spatial context at every graph snapshot to discover meaningful temporal patterns in longitudinal datasets. We evaluate the proposed model in the context of Parkinson’s disease (PD) progression using six years of longitudinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) profiles from 24 patients. Visit-based graphs were constructed by representing patients as nodes enriched with peptide-abundance features, and by connecting patients with similar features profiles. A Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) captures visit-specific spatial relationships, while a sequential model learns global temporal representations. A fusion module integrates both sources of information to produce enriched node embeddings that reflect inter- and intra-patient molecular dynamics. Clustering the learned embeddings reveals four distinct PD progression stages, supported by strong validity indices (Davies–Bouldin: 0.169; Calinski–Harabasz: 1264.24). Significant differences in motor severity (UPDRS 2 and UPDRS 3; p < 0.05) were observed across clusters, whereas non-motor scores showed a more diffuse pattern (p = 0.11). Compared with PCA, autoencoders, GCN, T-GCN, and GC-LSTM, the proposed architecture yields more clinically discriminative representations of disease severity. These findings demonstrate the potential of the proposed dynamic graph learning for data-driven disease staging and offer a generalizable framework for uncovering latent temporal patterns in longitudinal datasets.
Primary Area: learning on graphs and other geometries & topologies
Submission Number: 25570
Loading