On Uncertainty, Tempering, and Data Augmentation in Bayesian ClassificationDownload PDF

Published: 31 Oct 2022, 18:00, Last Modified: 05 Jan 2023, 01:24NeurIPS 2022 AcceptReaders: Everyone
Keywords: probabilistic methods, deep learning, Bayesian deep learning
TL;DR: Data augmentation causes underfitting, and when using softmax likelihood for classification, incorrectly models our beliefs about noise in the dataset.
Abstract: Aleatoric uncertainty captures the inherent randomness of the data, such as measurement noise. In Bayesian regression, we often use a Gaussian observation model, where we control the level of aleatoric uncertainty with a noise variance parameter. By contrast, for Bayesian classification we use a categorical distribution with no mechanism to represent our beliefs about aleatoric uncertainty. Our work shows that explicitly accounting for aleatoric uncertainty significantly improves the performance of Bayesian neural networks. We note that many standard benchmarks, such as CIFAR-10, have essentially no aleatoric uncertainty. Moreover, we show that data augmentation in approximate inference softens the likelihood, leading to underconfidence and misrepresenting our beliefs about aleatoric uncertainty. Accordingly, we find that a cold posterior, tempered by a power greater than one, often more honestly reflects our beliefs about aleatoric uncertainty than no tempering --- providing an explicit link between data augmentation and cold posteriors. We further show that we can match or exceed the performance of posterior tempering by using a Dirichlet observation model, where we explicitly control the level of aleatoric uncertainty, without any need for tempering.
Supplementary Material: pdf
27 Replies