From Adversarial Training to Generative Adversarial NetworksDownload PDF

27 Sept 2018 (modified: 22 Oct 2023)ICLR 2019 Conference Withdrawn SubmissionReaders: Everyone
Abstract: In this paper, we are interested in two seemingly different concepts: \textit{adversarial training} and \textit{generative adversarial networks (GANs)}. Particularly, how these techniques work to improve each other. To this end, we analyze the limitation of adversarial training as a defense method, starting from questioning how well the robustness of a model can generalize. Then, we successfully improve the generalizability via data augmentation by the ``fake'' images sampled from generative adversarial network. After that, we are surprised to see that the resulting robust classifier leads to a better generator, for free. We intuitively explain this interesting phenomenon and leave the theoretical analysis for future work. Motivated by these observations, we propose a system that combines generator, discriminator, and adversarial attacker together in a single network. After end-to-end training and fine tuning, our method can simultaneously improve the robustness of classifiers, measured by accuracy under strong adversarial attacks, and the quality of generators, evaluated both aesthetically and quantitatively. In terms of the classifier, we achieve better robustness than the state-of-the-art adversarial training algorithm proposed in (Madry \textit{et al.}, 2017), while our generator achieves competitive performance compared with SN-GAN (Miyato and Koyama, 2018).
Keywords: adversarial training, conditional GAN
TL;DR: We found adversarial training not only speeds up the GAN training but also increases the image quality
Community Implementations: [![CatalyzeX](/images/catalyzex_icon.svg) 3 code implementations](https://www.catalyzex.com/paper/arxiv:1807.10454/code)
5 Replies

Loading